Central OH Coal Co. v. Dir., Office of Workers' Comp.: Seeking Benefits from Ex-Employer

Boston Workers' compensation attorneys recognize some on-the-job injuries do not become apparent until much later in one's life. If a work-related injury becomes apparent after one's employment has been terminated, he or she may still be entitled to benefits. There may, however, be more work required to prove worker was injured on the job.

65901_hospital_corridor_3.jpgCentral OH Coal Co. v. Dir., Office of Workers' Comp. Programs involved an employee who worked at an above-ground coalmine from 1945 until he was laid off in 1999. While he never worked underground, he held many different jobs at above-ground strip mines, including as a heavy equipment operator.

There is no doubt that he was exposed to coal dust on a daily basis at the same levels that he would have been at an underground mine. In 1995, he was diagnosed with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), which is also known by coalminers as "black lung." He had also been a smoker for nearly 40 years, consuming more than a pack each day. The administrative law judge (ALJ) at his workers' compensation hearing estimated that he smoked the equivalent of 57 "pack years" of cigarettes based, on the amount he smoked.

In 2001, he applied to get his job back, but was not hired because he couldn't pass the required physical exam. The company believed that, even with his oxygen tank, he could not withstand the harsh environment of working at a coal mine.

Continue reading "Central OH Coal Co. v. Dir., Office of Workers' Comp.: Seeking Benefits from Ex-Employer " »

LeFiell Mfg. v. Super. Ct.: Workers' Compensation Exclusivity and Rare Exception

Our Boston workers' compensation attorneys understand some employers take shortcuts when it comes to on-the-job safety. For employees working closely with heavy equipment, the result can be devastating.

506099_caution_.jpgLeFiell Mfg. v. Super. Ct., an appeal before the California Court of Appeals, involved a worker who was injured while operating a swaging machine. In rendering its opinion, the court wrote at great length about what a swaging machine is and how it works.

Essentially, a swaging machine is designed to take large diameter tubes and turn them into small diameter tubes. It is basically crimps a pipe fitting over another pipe fitting. You could use a swaging machine to attach the end to a hose, so that it could be connected to a faucet or another hose. The way the machine works is that a series of hammers compresses around the tube that is being crimped. The hammers are part of dye assembly that can be changed to match the diameter of the pipe or tube being reduced.

Continue reading "LeFiell Mfg. v. Super. Ct.: Workers' Compensation Exclusivity and Rare Exception " »

State Accident Fund v. SC Second Injury Fund

Our Boston workers' compensation lawyers understand that preexisting conditions that are exacerbated by an on-the-job injury may require additional litigation.

knee-replacement---front-view-1183623-m.jpgState Accident Fund v. SC Second Injury Fund, an appeal argued in the South Carolina Supreme Court, involved a police officer who injured his knee while on the job. The claimant was treating his knee with non-surgical options, including injections of corticosteroids. He reached his maximum medical improvement (MMI) and was given a permanent disability rating of approximately 30 percent.

An MMI means that doctors have done everything feasible to treat an injury, and the cost of any additional treatment will outweigh any potential benefit. In the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, the Department of Industrial Accidents has created a guide for injured employees that explains this and other terms used.

Continue reading "State Accident Fund v. SC Second Injury Fund " »

Harris v. Millennium Hotel: Workers' Compensation Benefits for Same Sex Couples

Harris v. Millennium Hotel involved a worker who was shot and killed while working at a hotel in Alaska. The employer did not deny that the death occurred in the course of the worker's employment, but when her spouse filed a claim for workers' compensation death benefits, the employer denied the claim on grounds that they never received any proof that the deceased worker was legally married to the claimant.

wedding-ring-951344-m.jpgAs our Bostonworkers' compensation attorneys can explain, when a worker dies on the job, his or her surviving spouse may be eligible to receive workers' compensation death benefits. This may also have an effect on your ability to file a civil negligence lawsuit.

In Harris, the claimant filed a notice that she was filing a challenge to the constitutionality of the state workers' compensation statute on grounds that it was discriminatory against same sex couples who were not allowed to marry under state law.

The claimant submitted evidence to show that the couple had lived to together for many years and lived in every way as married couple, including becoming financially interdependent. The workers' compensation board affirmed the denial of her right to death benefits, due to fact that they were not legally married, and could not have been legally married under state law. The board had no authority to rule on the constitutionality of the statute and chose not to do so.

Continue reading "Harris v. Millennium Hotel: Workers' Compensation Benefits for Same Sex Couples " »

Stevens v. S.T. Servs.: A Petition to Terminate Disability Payments

Stevens v. S.T. Servs., an appeal from the Minnesota Supreme Court, involved a claimant who began working at liquid storage facility in the late 1970s. In the mid-1980s, the claimant injured both shoulders and the year after his injury, his employer terminated his services.

1031747_hospital.jpgFor the next seven years after his termination, surgeons performed multiple operations on the claimant's shoulders. During that period, the claimant applied for workers' compensation benefits, and an administrative law judge (ALJ) awarded him benefits under a Temporary Total Disability (TTD) rating.

As your Boston workers' compensation lawyer can explain, a TTD rating is one of several classifications for benefits under a program administered by the Executive Office for Workforce Development for the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.

In Stevens, the parties entered into a settlement in the mid-1990s, whereby the claimant was to be awarded a disability rating of permanent and temporary total disability and found unfit for any type of employment.

Several years later, the claimant moved to Alaska and became a licensed plumber. He could not lift anything, but served as a consultant about plumbing issues. Eventually, he was offered a job as a consultant at a big box home improvement store, where he earned about $25 per hour.

He needed to return to Minnesota to undergo a medical procedure on his shoulders, and, when he was there, he had to meet with an investigator from the workers' compensation insurance carrier. He disclosed his new job to the investigator. There was never any allegation that he attempted to commit any type of fraud with respect to his disability rating.

Continue reading "Stevens v. S.T. Servs.: A Petition to Terminate Disability Payments " »

Snowboard Park Owner Fined for Not Maintaining Workers' Compensation Insurance for Employees

Most employers are required to carry workers' compensation insurance under the law. Workers' compensation is a program aimed at being a compromise between the needs of injured workers and employers. The program is designed so that workers with on-the-job injuries can get the financial compensation they deserve fast, while at the same time, protecting the employer from having to pay out large settlements that were not figured in their financial plans.

snowboard-jump-1149772-m.jpgThe workers' compensation program was designed to cover not only medical bills, but also lost wages for workers who were injured on the job. In exchange for the ability to file a workers' compensation claim, workers are precluded from filing a separate civil action in most situations. This is the benefit to the employer. In reality, many employers see a mandate to carry workers' compensation coverage as a great compromise, and a few of them will do whatever they can to keeps costs down.

Our Boston workers' compensation attorneys understand how important it is to get your workers' compensation benefits as soon as possible. Your family depends on your income and any unnecessary wait can be detrimental.

Continue reading "Snowboard Park Owner Fined for Not Maintaining Workers' Compensation Insurance for Employees " »

Ohio Settles Lawsuit over Workers' Compensation Premiums

Our Boston workers' compensation attorneys understand that employers are interested in paying as little as possible for workers' compensation insurance premiums.

brownenvelopemoneybribe3.jpgAccording to a recent article in the Columbus Dispatch, the State of Ohio settled a lawsuit that had been going on for years over allegations that hundreds of thousands of employers were being overcharged for workers' compensation insurance premiums.

According to reports, the state agreed to create a $420 million fund to pay claims from employers who were overcharged for workers' compensation premiums between 2009 and 2011. This was slightly less than half of the $860 million that the judge ordered the state to repay. The state initially appealed this order, and the Court of Appeals reduced the amount to $670 million. A settlement was reached, and both sides are reported as being happy with the settlement agreement.

Since this case began, there have been major changes made to the state's workers' compensation program, including improvements in accounting methods and additional efforts to reduce work place accidents.

Continue reading "Ohio Settles Lawsuit over Workers' Compensation Premiums " »

Elms v. Renewal by Anderson: Common Law Employee Versus Independent Contractor Status

Our Boston workers' compensation attorneys understand that employers may try to allege that their workers are independent contractors in order to avoid paying benefits.

constructionhatsmall.jpgIn Elms v. Renewal by Anderson, a case from the Maryland Court of Appeals, the court decided on issues pertaining to whether an injured worker was an employee of the defendant or an independent contractor.

According to the record, the plaintiff was a licensed home improvement contractor. He was the owner and operator of a home improvement business. Some of the services he provided were the installation and restoration of windows and doors and general carpentry.
In the years before doing with business with the defendant, the plaintiff maintained a workers' compensation insurance policy for business. However, the plaintiff was never a beneficiary of the plan, nor was any of his other employees. The only one on the plan was the plaintiff's son.

Continue reading "Elms v. Renewal by Anderson: Common Law Employee Versus Independent Contractor Status " »

OSHA Focuses on Increased Worker Safety at Demolition Sites

Our Boston workers' compensations attorneys understand that in some jobs, employers must work harder to prevent on-the-job injuries.

1380293_digger.jpgThe United States Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) is increasing efforts to keep demolition employees safe on the job. While demolition is generally considered an inherently dangerous occupation, there are number of workplace injuries and deaths that OSHA says could be prevented with proper training and concern for workers' safety.

One of the major causes of these workplace injuries comes from having workers demolish a building without first conducting an engineering survey to gain a full understanding of the condition of the structure. Without such a survey, demolition companies will not know how walls and other structures will respond to the demolition process. The unexpected collapse of adjacent structures is a major cause of injuries to workers.

Continue reading "OSHA Focuses on Increased Worker Safety at Demolition Sites " »

Increased Fines for Employers Who Do Not Maintain Workers' Compensation Coverage

Our Boston workers' compensation attorneys understand that cases where employers have not complied with requirements to obtain coverage may require additional litigation.

money-problems.jpgIn a recent article, the News Virginian is reporting a substantial increase in the penalties faced by employers who do not maintain workers' compensation coverage from their employees.

Workers' compensation insurance has often been presented as a compromise aimed at striking a fair balance between the needs of workers and the needs of employers. Under the workers' compensation plan, an employee has a means to quickly obtain compensation for an on-the-job injury without the need to file a civil lawsuit against their employer.

Continue reading "Increased Fines for Employers Who Do Not Maintain Workers' Compensation Coverage " »

Filing a Civil Lawsuit and a Workers' Compensation Claim: On Serious or Willful Misconduct

Our Boston workers' compensation attorneys understand that sometimes clients may be able to file a civil lawsuit in addition to their workers' compensation claim.

230578_hospital_6.jpgA story from 7 News Boston discusses a truly horrific rape and stabbing of a teacher while she was at work. This teacher was employed by the Department of Corrections in Arizona. She was teaching a class at a prison unit that houses sex offenders. The prison allegedly did not provide any guards for the protection of the teachers or issue the teachers any type of safety equipment.

After teaching a class, the teacher was raped and stabbed, according to reports. The alleged assailant has been charged with rape, kidnapping, assault and other charges. The victim has filed for workers' compensation to compensate her for the physical and mental and pain she has suffered since her attack.

Continue reading "Filing a Civil Lawsuit and a Workers' Compensation Claim: On Serious or Willful Misconduct " »

The Obesity Epidemic and Workplace Safety

The American Society of Safety Engineers recently held a Safety 2014 conference. Among the issues discussed at the conference was the dramatic increase in the rate of obesity and the impact that a more obese workforce will have on workplace safety. human-jaws-434803-m.jpg

When workers are heavier, they face different types of risks on the job and are in greater danger of experiencing certain kinds of workplace injuries. With more than a third of the U.S. population currently classified as obese, employers need to account for the special needs of this large portion of the workplace. When a worker gets hurt on-the-job, the injured employee should consult with an experienced Boston workers' compensation lawyer for help.

Continue reading "The Obesity Epidemic and Workplace Safety " »

Boston Workplaces Need a Rescue Plan For Fall Injuries

Many employers throughout Boston are well aware of the requirements set by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration regarding fall protection equipment. Yet, falls remain a top cause of workplace injuries and deaths, especially in the construction field. One possible reason why falls often cause serious or even fatal injuries is because many employers' fall protection plans do not go far enough. Employers need to not only take steps to prevent falls but also should have a plan in place for what happens after the fall. knocking-on-heavens-door-1387913-m.jpg

Recently, Safety BLR published a comprehensive article on the importance of having a rescue plan in place in case a fall occurs. A rescue plan could allow an employee to get more timely assistance so his injuries are less likely to be devastating or deadly. Those who do suffer falls can make a workers' compensation claim with the help of a Boston workers' compensation lawyer, and employers can cut their costs for work-injury benefits by ensuring that workers get the most prompt treatment for injury.

Continue reading "Boston Workplaces Need a Rescue Plan For Fall Injuries " »

Massachusetts First-Responder Injuries a Risk Through Fourth of July Weekend

Our Boston workers' compensation attorneys would like to take the opportunity to thank the many brave first responders and emergency personnel this Fourth of July weekend. While most Americans have the day off from work and are having a relaxing and enjoyable Fourth of July weekend, many emergency personnel and first responders will be out in force keeping all of us safe. Whether they are patrolling the highways, standing by at sporting events and fireworks displays, or performing any number of important tasks, they remain on the job.

fireworks12.jpgEach year, firefighters, police officers, ambulance drivers, EMTs, and paramedics, rank among the most dangerous occupations. Firefighters expose themselves to all kinds of risks every time they go out on a call. There are dangers related to driving to an emergency, smoke inhalation, and falling objects during fire rescue operations. For police, the most common cause of workplace injuries are vehicle collisions and being assaulted during an arrest. EMTs and paramedics are commonly injured in typical on-the-job situations, plus the many dangerous job tasks associated with helping patients. One particularly scary risk is contracting a blood borne illness from accidental needle sticks. Trying to restrain a patient in a moving ambulance to give an injection is no easy task.

While there is no doubt that these first responders know they are putting themselves at risk, as many of them have adopted the motto "so others may live," when they are injured on the job, they deserve to receive fair and adequate workers' compensation benefits. Unfortunately, securing adequate benefits can sometimes be a real problem. In Florida, for example, there is a two-year limit on workers' compensation benefits for emergency personnel.

Continue reading "Massachusetts First-Responder Injuries a Risk Through Fourth of July Weekend " »

Medlin v. Weaver Cooke Constr. - Poor Economy Weighed in Workers' Compensation Case

An employee who claimed both workers' compensation and unemployment benefits at the same time found himself the subject of sudden stoppage of the former, with a demand to pay back his former employer for a portion of those benefits.
In Massachusetts, Boston workers' compensation lawyers know it is possible to obtain both types of benefits under certain circumstances, per MLG Part I, Title XXI, Chapter 152, Section 36B. Essentially, only those with partial incapacity can collect both types of benefits, and only then under strict guidelines.

The laws can vary from state-to-state, but the general idea is that these types of benefits serve two very different purposes. Unemployment benefits are awarded when you can't work, but are actively looking. Workers' compensation benefits are paid when you have suffered a disabling injury at work. Someone who is totally incapacitated would, by definition, lack the ability to work and therefore couldn't be actively looking for employment.

Continue reading "Medlin v. Weaver Cooke Constr. - Poor Economy Weighed in Workers' Compensation Case " »